Report #5

September 21, 2005

 

The Koi Chronicles: "Bad News"

 

KKOI had undergone some changes at the corporate level.  In an effort to reach a new audience, the feral cat management changed the call letters and hired two koi news anchors. Jeanine and Roger were delighted with their new job prospect at first, but quickly, they became incensed at the station's stratification and corresponding pay scale (with felines in positions of power, koi anchors as window dressing, and a mosquito fish crew). Equally angering was the feral cats' species-centric, insensitive language, rife with dominant imagery that perpetuated, reflected, or implied the marginalization of fish of all kinds. On the new anchors' first day, Chuck, the station manager, thinking he was being complimentary, explained the new strategy to gain popularity among fish: "Market research shows that in koi aesthetics, butterfly koi are the considered the height of beauty among fish. With you two long-finned butterfly koi smiling ant the public, we'll be sure to hook 'em and reel 'em in!" Understandably, this got things off to a rocky start. Jeanine and Roger tried to sensitize the cats to the nuances of language after this, but it was slow going. As is often the case, the legacy of past intentional hurtful speech now colored the fishes' interpretation of phrases that perhaps contained no intentional disrespect. Furthermore, the cats remained largely insensitive to the heart of the issue, brushing off the fishes' linguistic demands as merely "superficial semantic change" and "PC drivel." The combination of these two dynamics set the stage for continuing problems.

 

This morning, Roger and Jeanine sat, coiffed and perky, behind the news desk, reading the morning news from the teleprompter. Roger began by announcing the effect of yesterday's winds, the fallen branch that spanned the pond, the good fortune of the pond's residents and general structure, for having survived the branch incident in good form, and the heroic removal of the branch by a kind-hearted human. He then turned things over to Jeanine to announce the recent disappearance of neighbor cat Wiley, pointing to the flyer his human left at the door yesterday. Jeanine pointed out the cat's physical description and read off Wiley's human's phone number, before proceeding to read the human's request that all people please look for cats trapped in their garages and yards. In an unfortunate slip of the tongue, Jeanine (mistakenly or subversively) misread the last phrase, instead saying, "Please lock your cats, trapped, in your garages and yards." Jeanine caught her mistake right away, stared right at the camera, and tried unsuccessfully to control her giggles as she corrected her wording. Furious, Chuck hissed, "Can it, Jeanine!" Jeanine's lip started to quiver as her mind leapt to thoughts of her tuna friend's recent mishap. She got flustered, and missed the next teleprompt.

 

Chuck didn't believe for a second that Jeanine's slip was an honest mistake, and, afterall, he was still blind to the lingering effects of hurtful comments from the past.  He was sick of what he short-sightedly considered to be Jeanine's "emotional outbursts." Chuck stammered, "Oh, get over it, Jeanine! We've got bigger fish to fr--" Chuck stopped as soon as he saw Jeanine's jaw drop and Roger's face deepen two shades of orange. Even Chuck realized that it was a poor choice of words.

 

 

(Author's note: Yesterday, when I brought the mail in, there was a flyer stuck in the door announcing that Wiley is lost. I mean no disrespect to Wiley or his human in including his fate in today's report. I am merely trying to report all house-related news within the stylistic constraints of the genre.)

 

(Additional author's note: I am also not making trying to make light of our local news debacle, but a display of the insensitivity of the media (and its tendency to brush off legitimate issues as political correctness, and, in so doing deny their worth) is timely. The county fair starts today and just yesterday, there was news that one musical act was canceled after the Bakersfield Californian ran an article explaining the white supremecist background of a 13-year-old local musical duo. (Their album contains a song titled "Aryan Man Awake," which they had decided not to perform at the fair). The director of this event explained that he canceled it because the article about the duo might cause a "disruption." TV news media last night covered the story and said that the director fears that "the band's political and social message could attract violence." Never mind that the message itself could incite violence. That part seems to be OK with most of our local media. It is an anti-supremecist reaction to white supremacy that seems to be feared. A colleague is trying to contact the director to see if he knew that the duo had a white supremacist focus and following (even if they were not going to perform actively racist songs at the fair). As yet, it is unclear if he knew about that.)